Lesbians French can be taken. The Italians only shoot straight bullshit. 
Il tribunale civile di Besancon ha accepted the request of a couple of women to start practices for adoption. This positive outcome of a legal struggle and civil life and 11 years after the appeal to the European Court for Human Rights which had found France guilty of discrimination because the applicant's homosexuality had been considered because of the refusal.
I have not studied the news but I think it's adoption by single and not a gay couple, though as usual the Journal Svastichella Felt gives us pearls of populism Italic worthy of note. Here are some excerpts of comments to the news:
"Imagine a school boy before and after that child will feel like before the children who have a normal family in front of him and the two mothers (?) kissing each other and maybe something more. "
note is the tendency of women to gay couple on the sidewalk in front of public schools and / or other public buildings .
"I agree with those who say today that gay couples" use "in a sense, perhaps more children adoptions to meet their own needs, selfishly speaking, you want to be a parent and in my view to" prove "now and forever more to the world that they are that their battle continues. "
I totally agree, the desire of a child in my opinion is always a selfish act, even in heterosexual couples. None asked us to come to the world, not the son of Toto Riina and Provenzano, nor children Albano and Romina, and even those of the Nano have asked to be born and yet they were born in those families and those couples with no possibility parents to choose the most appropriate. So what's the difference with a heterosexual couple gets engaged at age 16, married at 20 to 23 breeds and in a continuous cycle with no reflection on the role of parent? To me everyone should pass an examination before they had a son, is my moral and cultural eugenics. Yet no one can prevent an owner of spermadotato penis and a vulva holder of using eggs to give birth to and raise the potential social misfits. But this is a privilege to be reserved for heterosexual. The "normal" family is the privileged repository of violence, ignorance and injustice and yet no one has ever thought of banning people to raise a family because of the potentially worst perversions of human receptacle.
I deliberately avoided the gratuitous insults and populism penny, no use arguing against ignorance. Then elect the undisputed queen of this pearl of fantalegislazione comments:
"The prosecutor would have to make a preliminary statement saying that while human rights in line with the position of homosexuals in society does not endorse the right of adoption to couples in which the applicant is not 'free the possibility of abuse / adoption of a minor and therefore contrary to the law punishes the abuse of minors. This does not mean that the face of intentions, but it means putting a reasonable limitation on human rights in line with what you use to do with suspects or people awaiting trial who will be deprived of personal liberty by arrest or the house. "
So homosexuals as such" are not exempt from the possibility of abuse of a minor. " And a straight? If it limited the freedom of individuals (gay) child abuse as a precaution, then, the data in hand, we should apply the same method for all figures professionali e umane che ritornano più spesso nelle statistiche di abuso ai minori: padri di famiglia (etero), preti, maestri e tutti coloro lavorano a stretto contatto coi bambini.
Secondo questo illuminato commento andrebbe messo sotto sorveglianza chiunque appartenga ad una di queste categoria. Praticamente il 60% della popolazione italiana.
Il diritto ad essere "cattivi" genitori è una prerogativa esclusiva degli etero e nessuno si azzardi a toccarla. Forse perché come scriveva Tolstoj "Tutte le famiglie felici si assomigliano; ogni famiglia infelice è invece disgraziata a modo suo."
